Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suppose (T,M) is a measurable space, X is a topological space, and ∅ ≠ F(t) ⊂ X for t ∈ T. Denote GrF = \ (t,x):x ∈ F(t)\. The problem surveyed (reviewing work of others) is that of existence off: f:T → X such that f(t) ∈ F(t) for t ∈ T and f- 1 (U) ∈ M for open U ⊂ X. The principal conditions that yield such f are (i) X is Polish, each $F(t)$ is closed, and \ t:F(t) ∩ U ≠ ∅ \ ∈ M a .tit whenever U ⊂ X is open (Kuratowski and Ryll-Nardzewski and, under stronger assumption, Castaing), or (ii) T is a Hausdorff space, GrF is a continuous image of a Polish space, and M is the σ-algebra of sets measurable with respect to an outer measure, among which are the open sets of T (primarily von Neumann). The latter result follows from the former by lifting F in a natural way to a map into the closed sets of a Polish space. This procedure leads to the theory of set-valued functions of Suslin type (Leese), which extends the , result (i) to comprehend a considerable portion of the results on the problem surveyed. Among the topics addressed, measurable implicit functions and the case where X is a linear space and each $F(t)$ is convex and compact are particularly important to control theory, for example. With $T = X = [0,1]$ and GrF Borel, an elegant partition of GrF into Lebesgue measurable maps from T to X, parameterized by Borel functions, has been found (Wesley) via Cohen forcing methods. Other topics discussed include pointwise optimal selections, selections of partitions, uniformization, non-σ-algebras in place of M, Lusin measurability, and set-valued measures. Substantial historical comments and an extensive bibliography are included. (See addenda (i)–(iii).)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel H. Wagner (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: