Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Productivity, quality, and persistence of ‘Coastal’ bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] pastures are affected by fertilization, but possible interactions with defoliation regime including animal grazing are not fully known. We evaluated three sources of fertilization with equivalent N rates [inorganic, crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) cover crop plus inorganic, and chicken (Gallus gallus) broiler litter] factorially arranged with four defoliation regimes [unharvested, cattle (Bos taurus) grazing to maintain high (4.5 ± 1.6 Mg ha−1) and low (2.5 ± 1.1 Mg ha−1) forage mass, and hayed monthly] on estimated forage dry matter production, forage and surface residue C/N ratio, and ground cover of pastures on a Typic Kanhapludult in Georgia during 5 yr. Mean annual forage dry matter production was 7.5 ± 0.7 Mg ha−1 with hay harvest but declined (1.3 Mg ha−1 yr−1) significantly with time as a result of lower precipitation. With grazing, estimated production was 8.3 ± 1.0 Mg ha−1 and did not change with time, suggesting that grazing cattle sustained forage productivity by recycling nutrients and creating better surface soil conditions. Coastal bermudagrass as a percentage of ground cover (initially 81%) declined 5 ± 2% yr−1 with unharvested and grazing to maintain low forage mass, declined 3 ± 1% yr−1 with haying, and remained unchanged (−1 ± 1% yr−1) with grazing to maintain high forage mass. Pastures with high forage mass were more productive than with low forage mass (9.2 ± 1.6 vs. 7.5 ± 1.1 Mg ha−1) from a forage sustainability perspective, primarily by avoiding encroachment of undesirable plant species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franzluebbers et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: