Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
If tiller numbers/area of Pensacola bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum, Flugge) could be correlated with yield and tillers/area is related to N fertility status, fertility and yield research would be simplified. To test the concept that a yield predictive model could be developed, an established Pensacola bahiagrass sod was fertilized with 0, 84, 168, and 336 kg/ha N in 1973 and 1974. Starting in early June and continuing until October plots were clipped monthly at heights of 2.5 and 7.5 cm. Before clipping, 1.0 tillers with mature leaves/plot were collected and numbers of clipped elongated and unclipped leaves were determined. Tillers on duplicate (15 cm)2 areas were counted after clipping. Dry forage was increased over the 0 N check by adding 84 and 168 kg/ha N. The 336 kg/ha N did not increase forage yields over 168 kg/ha N. Clipping at 2.5 cm produced almost three times as much forage as clipping at 7.5 cm. Number of leaves/stolon/season averaged between 20.2 and 22.0 and was influenced by N rate. At each of the five harvest dates, an average of 1.3 leaves/tiller (growing point) was elongating. Nitrogen application increased tiller numbers by up to 300% and the largest number of new tillers occurred in June. Some data as collected were predictive of N and leaf generation rate, but variations in tiller numbers/area and probably leaf weight/N relationships prevented the development of an effective yield prediction model. Further refinement of the data is needed. Statistical models based on tillers/area were not effective in predicting yields. The lack of an effective relationship between tillers/area and yield was believed due to many young tillers dying before contributing to yield and variations in leaf size reflecting N fertilization and tiller age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beaty et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: