Key result
Internal mammary artery grafts demonstrated a higher rate of remaining intact compared to saphenous vein grafts at 6 to 12 months postoperatively (88% vs 71%).
Why the study?
Does internal mammary artery grafting improve angiographic patency compared to saphenous vein grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Cohort
Does internal mammary artery grafting improve angiographic patency compared to saphenous vein grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 88% vs 71%
Internal mammary artery grafts demonstrate better angiographic patency and less stenosis at 6 to 12 months compared to saphenous vein grafts when bypassing the left anterior descending artery.
Supports preferential IMA use for LAD grafting in CABG; extends observational patency data but leaves open need for randomized outcome trials.
Angiographic status of the saphenous vein graft (SVG) and the internal mammary artery graft (IMAG) anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery were compared at two different postoperative periods; - within 2 months and at 6 to 12 months after the operation. In 50 SVGs and 35 IMAGs which were studied at the early postoperative period, the rate of intact, stenosed and occluded grafts were almost the same in these two kinds of grafts. However, in 35 SVGs and 25 IMAGs which were studied at the later period, the stenosis of SVG increased significantly while IMAG remained intact. The rate of intact, stenosed and occluded grafts at postoperative 6 to 12 months were 71%, 23% and 6% in SVG, and 88%, 8% and 4% in IMAG, respectively. Considering the better angiographic quality of IMAG, use of IMAG to bypass the most important coronary artery should be considered especially when the patients are younger.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suma et al. (1988) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery bypass surgery. Internal mammary artery graft (IMAG) vs. Saphenous vein graft (SVG) was evaluated on Intact graft rate at 6 to 12 months. Internal mammary artery grafts demonstrated a higher rate of remaining intact compared to saphenous vein grafts at 6 to 12 months postoperatively (88% vs 71%).
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: