Key result
Supportive and cursory preoperative interviews significantly reduced anxiety in highly anxious patients, while cursory interviews significantly increased anxiety in relatively non-anxious patients.
Why the study?
Does a supportive preoperative interview reduce anxiety levels compared to a cursory interview in patients undergoing therapeutic abortion?
RCT (n=40)
Single-blind
Random order
Does a supportive preoperative interview reduce anxiety levels compared to a cursory interview in patients undergoing therapeutic abortion?
Preoperative anxiety levels can be modulated by the type of anesthesiologist interview, with cursory interviews potentially increasing anxiety in initially non-anxious patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Match interview style to baseline anxiety to avoid increasing it in non-anxious patients; extends RCT evidence for tailored preoperative communication.
Forty healthy volunteer hospital patients who had been admitted For therapeutic abortions were given anxiety scale questionnaires during the afternoon of the day before operation. That evening. the anesthesiologist conducted either a “cursory” (brief and minimally informative) or “supportive” (long and relatively) informative with maximal rapport) preoperative interview. The following morning the Skin Conductance Anxiety Test (SCAT), a physiological measure of anxiety level, was carried out as part of the induction procedure on the non‐premedicated patients. The random order determining the type of interview was known only to the anesthesiologist and no scoring was carried out until after the conclusion of all testing. The investigation showed that highly anxious patients had their anxiety level significantly reduced by both cursory and supportive interviews, while the relatively non‐anxious patients had their anxiety levels significantly increased by cursory interviews. It was again demonstrated that the level of anxiety is a determinant of the amount of thiopental sodium required for induction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (1975) conducted an RCT in Preoperative anxiety (n=40). Supportive preoperative interview vs. Cursory preoperative interview was evaluated on Anxiety level measured by Skin Conductance Anxiety Test (SCAT). Supportive and cursory preoperative interviews significantly reduced anxiety in highly anxious patients, while cursory interviews significantly increased anxiety in relatively non-anxious patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: