Key result
Digital subtraction angiography provided diagnostic images in all cases and showed complete agreement with conventional left ventriculography for assessing left ventricular wall movement.
Why the study?
Does digital subtraction angiography provide a reliable assessment of left ventricular function compared to conventional left ventriculography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=25)
Does digital subtraction angiography provide a reliable assessment of left ventricular function compared to conventional left ventriculography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Digital subtraction angiography provides a reliable, outpatient-friendly method for assessing overall left ventricular function and distinguishing between resectable lesions and global impairment.
Twenty five patients who had undergone conventional coronary arteriography and left ventriculography for suspected coronary artery disease had left ventriculography performed by digital subtraction angiography as outpatients; there were no complications requiring admission to hospital. A catheter was introduced percutaneously and positioned in the superior vena cava; 40-50 ml of contrast medium was injected at 16-18 ml/s. Left ventriculograms were recorded in the 30 degrees right anterior oblique projection. Diagnostic images were recorded in each case. Left ventricular wall movement was assessed as normal in nine patients, globally hypokinetic in 10, and aneurysmal in six. In each case there was agreement between the two methods. Ejection fraction varied between 17% and 78%. It is concluded that digital subtraction angiography provides a reliable assessment of overall left ventricular function and distinguishes between those patients with a potentially resectable lesion and those with global impairment of function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenbaum et al. (1984) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=25). Digital subtraction angiography vs. Conventional left ventriculography was evaluated on Agreement in left ventricular wall movement assessment. Digital subtraction angiography provided diagnostic images in all cases and showed complete agreement with conventional left ventriculography for assessing left ventricular wall movement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: