Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The dimeric complex [{Ru(η6-p-cymene)(μ-Cl)Cl}2] reacts with iminophosphorane-phosphine ligands Ph2PCH2P(NR)Ph2 (R = SiMe31, p-C6F4CN 2, p-C5F4N 3), in dichloromethane at room temperature, to afford the neutral derivatives [Ru(η6-p-cymene)Cl2{κ1-P-Ph2PCH2P(NR)Ph2}] (R = SiMe34, p-C6F4CN 5, p-C5F4N 6). Treatment of 4–6 with NaPF6 in methanol allows the preparation of cationic species [Ru(η6-p-cymene)Cl{κ2-P,N-Ph2PCH2P(NR)Ph2}][PF6] (R = H 7, p-C6F4CN 8, p-C5F4N 9). While complexes 8 and 9 react with anionic ligands yielding neutral derivatives [Ru(η6-p-cymene)X2{κ1-P-Ph2PCH2P(NR)Ph2}] (R = p-C6F4CN, X = Br 10a, I 10b, N310c, CN 10d, NCO 10e; R = p-C5F4N, X = Br 11a, I 11b, N311c, CN 11d, NCO 11e), cationic species [Ru(η6-p-cymene)X{κ2-P,N-Ph2PCH2P(NH)Ph2}][PF6] (X = Br 12a, I 12b, N312c, CN 12d, NCO 12e) are exclusively formed starting from 7. Complexes 8 and 9 also react with neutral ligands such as phosphines, pyridine, acetonitrile or isocyanides affording compounds [Ru(η6-p-cymene)Cl(PR3){κ1-P-Ph2PCH2P(NR)Ph2}][PF6] (R = p-C6F4CN, PR3 = PMe313a, PMe2Ph 13b, PMePh213c, PPh313d; R = p-C5F4N, PR3 = PMe314a, PMe2Ph 14b, PMePh214c, PPh314d), [Ru(η6-p-cymene)Cl(py){κ1-P-Ph2PCH2P(NR)Ph2}][PF6] (R = p-C6F4CN 15; R = p-C5F4N 16), [Ru(η6-p-cymene)Cl(NCMe){κ1-P-Ph2PCH2P(NR)Ph2}][PF6] (R = p-C6F4CN 17; R = p-C5F4N 18) and [Ru(η6-p-cymene)Cl(CNR′){κ1-P-Ph2PCH2P(NR)Ph2}][PF6] (R = p-C6F4CN, R′ = Cy 19a, 2,6-C6H3Me219b; R = p-C5F4N, R′ = Cy 20a, 2,6-C6H3Me220b), respectively. The synthesis of complexes [Ru(η3:η3-C10H16)Cl2{κ1-P-Ph2PCH2P(NR)Ph2}] (R = SiMe321, p-C6F4CN 22, p-C5F4N 23) and [Ru(η3:η3-C10H16)Cl{κ2-P,N-Ph2PCH2P(NH)Ph2}][BF4] 24 starting from the bis(allyl)-ruthenium(IV) dimer [{Ru(η3:η3-C10H16)(μ-Cl)Cl}2] and ligands 1–3 is also reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cadierno et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: