Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated whether apolipoprotein E (APOE εε4) genotype-guided lecanemab escalation mitigates the APOE εε4-driven amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) with edema (ARIA-E) gradient and whether ARIA-E and ARIA with hemosiderin deposition (ARIA-H) are mechanistically distinct. METHODS: Five hundred eight patients with early Alzheimer's disease received APOE genotype-guided lecanemab escalation (target maximum plasma concentration [Cmax] thresholds: 118, 308, and 404 µg/mL for εε4/εε4, heterozygote, and non-carrier) across eight Korean centers, with magnetic resonance imaging-based ARIA surveillance. RESULTS: ARIA-E incidence was 2.0% in non-carriers and 6.2% in εε4/εε4 homozygotes (εε4/εε4-versus-non-carrier OR 3.25, versus 8.49 in Clarity AD and 8.32 in Japan post-marketing surveillance). Any ARIA-H was independently predicted by baseline cerebral microbleeds, white matter hyperintensity (WMH), age, and APOE εε4 allele dose (aORs 1.23, 1.50, 1.04, 1.75). DISCUSSION: Under genotype-guided escalation, observations are compatible with - but do not establish - attenuation of the APOE εε4-driven ARIA-E gradient, whereas ARIA-H risk reflected baseline cerebrovascular burden. These findings raise the hypothesis of a dual-axis safety framework requiring randomized confirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: