Key result
Perirenal fat surface area ≥ 40 cm2 was associated with an increased risk of any postoperative complication compared to < 40 cm2 (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.1-2.6).
Why the study?
Does perirenal fat surface area ≥ 40 cm2 increase the risk of 30-day postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective colon cancer surgery?
Cohort (n=610)
No
Does perirenal fat surface area ≥ 40 cm2 increase the risk of 30-day postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective colon cancer surgery?
Odds Ratio: 1.68 (95% CI 1.1–2.6)
Perirenal fat surface area ≥ 40 cm2 is an easily measured indirect marker of visceral obesity that is associated with an increased risk of 30-day postoperative complications in elective colon cancer surgery.
Does not support routine risk stratification; leaves open whether perirenal fat measurement adds value beyond standard predictors in colon cancer surgery.
Aim Visceral obesity is associated with perioperative and postoperative complications in colorectal surgery. We aimed to investigate the association between the perirenal fat surface area (PRF) and postoperative complications. Method Data on 610 patients undergoing curative, elective colon cancer resection between 2006 and 2016 at Stockholm South General Hospital were retrieved from a local quality register. We assessed perioperative and postoperative outcomes using a multinomial regression model adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and surgical approach (open/laparoscopy) in relation to PRF. Results PRF could be measured in 605 patients; the median area was 24 cm2. Patients with PRF ≥ 40 cm2 had longer operation time (median 223 vs 184 min), more intra‐operative bleeding (250 vs 125 ml), reoperations (11% vs 6%), surgical complications (27% vs 13%) and nonsurgical infectious complications (16% vs 9%) than patients with PRF < 40 cm2, but there were no differences in the need for intensive care or duration of hospital stay. The multivariate analyses revealed an increased risk of any complication [OR 1.68 (95% CI 1.1–2.6)], which was even more pronounced for moderate complications [Clavien–Dindo II, OR 2.14 (CI 1.2–2.4]; Clavien–Dindo III, OR 2.35 (CI 1.0–5.5)] in patients with PRF ≥ 40 vs < 40 cm2. The absolute risk of complications was similar in men and women with PRF ≥ 40 cm2. Conclusion PRF, an easily measured indirect marker of visceral obesity, was associated with overall and moderate complications in men and women and could serve as a useful tool in the assessment of preoperative risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hagopian et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Colon cancer (n=610). Perirenal fat surface area ≥ 40 cm2 vs. Perirenal fat surface area < 40 cm2 was evaluated on Any complication (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.1-2.6). Perirenal fat surface area ≥ 40 cm2 was associated with an increased risk of any postoperative complication compared to < 40 cm2 (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.1-2.6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: