Key result
The proposed multiple region of interests signal extraction and graph signal analysis method identified deep breathing during walking with an accuracy of 75.5%.
Why the study?
Existing non-contact breath assessments require subjects to stay relatively still, whereas detecting breath signals while moving forward is challenged by trunk displacement, deformation, and short signal duration.
Absolute Event Rate: 75.5% vs 59.8%
A novel unobtrusive depth-camera-based system using multiple ROIs and graph signal analysis can identify deep breathing in walking individuals with approximately 75% accuracy.
This paper presents an unobtrusive solution that can automatically identify deep breath when a person is walking past the global depth camera. Existing non-contact breath assessments achieve satisfactory results under restricted conditions when human body stays relatively still. When someone moves forward, the breath signals detected by depth camera are hidden within signals of trunk displacement and deformation, and the signal length is short due to the short stay time, posing great challenges for us to establish models. To overcome these challenges, multiple region of interests (ROIs) based signal extraction and selection method is proposed to automatically obtain the signal informative to breath from depth video. Subsequently, graph signal analysis (GSA) is adopted as a spatial-temporal filter to wipe the components unrelated to breath. Finally, a classifier for identifying deep breath is established based on the selected breath-informative signal. In validation experiments, the proposed approach outperforms the comparative methods with the accuracy, precision, recall and F1 of 75.5%, 76.2%, 75.0% and 75.2%, respectively. This system can be extended to public places to provide timely and ubiquitous help for those who may have or are going through physical or mental trouble.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) studied Healthy (algorithm validation for deep breath identification) (n=15). Multiple ROIs based signal extraction and graph signal analysis vs. Single ROI and PCA methods was evaluated on Accuracy of deep breath identification. The proposed multiple region of interests signal extraction and graph signal analysis method identified deep breathing during walking with an accuracy of 75.5%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: