Why the study?
Aortic regurgitation is detrimental in patients with LVADs, and further data were needed regarding the feasibility and outcomes of off-label TAVR in this population.
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improve outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation?
Observational (n=11)
No
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improve outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TAVR is a technically challenging but feasible off-label treatment for moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation in LVAD patients, offering potential improvements in functional status and quality of life.
Background: Aortic regurgitation (AR) is common and detrimental in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Off-label use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a potential treatment option. Further data are required regarding the feasibility and outcomes of TAVR to treat AR in LVAD recipients. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with LVADs who underwent TAVR for the treatment of AR at a single center was performed. All echocardiograms were independently reviewed to ensure accuracy. Results: Eleven patients with continuous-flow LVADs underwent TAVR for AR. All patients had moderate or severe AR with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV symptoms. Implantation of more than 1 valve was required in 4 (36.3%) patients; 1 patient died during the procedure because of valve migration into the left ventricle and 1 patient died in-hospital after TAVR. Of 9 (81.8%) patients discharged alive, 8 (72.7%) were alive at 12 months and all survivors had improvement in AR severity, natriuretic peptide levels, left ventricle end-diastolic diameter, and NYHA class. Five (62.5%) survivors had a large improvement (>20 points) in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score at 1 year. One survivor experienced heart failure, requiring hospitalization, within 1 year. Conclusions: In this single-center series, TAVR for the treatment of AR in patients with LVADs is technically challenging but feasible in select patients and may produce durable improvements in AR severity, functional status, and quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gondi et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Aortic regurgitation in patients with left ventricular assist devices (n=11). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was evaluated on Survival at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: