Key result
Two-team simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty in obese patients resulted in a major complication rate of 8.6% compared to 5.4% for unilateral procedures, a non-significant difference (p=0.28).
Why the study?
Does two-team simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty increase perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to unilateral total knee arthroplasty in obese patients?
Cohort (n=299)
No
Does two-team simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty increase perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to unilateral total knee arthroplasty in obese patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.6% vs 5.4%
p-value: p=0.28
Two-team simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty in obese patients appears to have similar major complication rates compared to unilateral procedures, despite increased blood loss and transfusion requirements.
Similar major complication rates in this cohort should not yet change practice; leaves open comparative safety of simultaneous bilateral TKA in obesity.
BACKGROUND: Although the rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality with simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty remain a concern, multiple studies have shown the procedure to be safe in selected patient populations. Evidence also remains mixed regarding the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in obese patients. The purpose of this paper is to compare the rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality in consecutive obese patients undergoing two-team simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty and unilateral total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: The records on all two-team simultaneous total knee arthroplasties and unilateral total knee arthroplasties from October 1997 to December 2007 were reviewed. A total of 151 patients with a body mass index (BMI) >30 undergoing two-team simultaneous total knee arthroplasty and 148 patients with a BMI >30 undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed to determine perioperative morbidity and mortality as well as one-year mortality rates. RESULTS: Preoperative patient characteristics did not show any significant differences between groups. The simultaneous bilateral group had significantly longer operative times (127.4 versus 112.7 minutes, p < 0.01), estimated blood loss (176.7 versus 111.6 mL, p = 0.01), percentage of patients requiring blood transfusion (64.9% versus 13.9%, p < 0.01), length of hospital stay (3.72 versus 3.30 days, p < 0.01), and percentage of patients requiring extended care facility usage at discharge (63.6% versus 27.8%, p < 0.01). No significant difference between unilateral and bilateral groups was seen in regards to total complication rate, major or minor complication subgroup rate, or any particular complication noted. Doubling the variables in the unilateral group for a staged total knee arthroplasty scenario did create significant increases over the simultaneous data in almost every data category. CONCLUSIONS: Two-team simultaneous total knee arthroplasty appears to be safe in obese patients, with similar complication rates as compared to unilateral procedures. Two-team simultaneous total knee arthroplasty also appears to have potential benefits over a staged procedure in the obese patient, although more study is required regarding this topic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Obesity and osteoarthritis requiring total knee arthroplasty (n=299). Two-team simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty vs. Unilateral total knee arthroplasty was evaluated on Major complications (including death, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, deep infection, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, acute renal insufficiency, or need for further surgery) (p=0.28). Two-team simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty in obese patients resulted in a major complication rate of 8.6% compared to 5.4% for unilateral procedures, a non-significant difference (p=0.28).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: