Since use of the pneumatic tourniquet is standard procedure for the hand surgeon, ischemic and reperfusion injury is a risk. To determine optimal periods of ischemia, 100 rabbit hindlimbs were subjected to various ischemic insults and analyzed for malondialdehyde (an indicator of free-radical production). Group 1 (3 hours of continuous ischemia) had 12.5 percent more reperfusion damage than controls (p less than 0.05). Group 2 (three 1-hour ischemic insults) had 10 percent more damage than controls (p less than 0.05). Group 3 (two 90-minute ischemic episodes) had 21 percent more damage than controls (p = 0.0001). Group 4 (4 1/2 hours of continuous ischemia) had 14.5 percent more damage than controls (p less than 0.01). Group 5 (three 90-minute ischemic episodes) had 10.8 percent more damage than controls (p less than 0.01). Group 6 (6 hours of continuous ischemia) had 17.5 percent more damage than controls (p less than 0.002). Group 7 (four 90-minute ischemic episodes) had 14 percent more damage than controls (p less than 0.01). Group 8 (three 2-hour ischemic episodes) had 22.5 percent more damage than controls (p less than 0.003). And group 9 (two 3-hour ischemic episodes) had 42 percent more damage than controls (p less than 0.0001). These results suggest a direct correlation in reperfusion injury with duration of tourniquet ischemia. Additionally, allowing specific reperfusion periods in some groups ultimately increased the amount of reperfusion injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Concannon et al. (1992) studied this question.