Key result
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) nursing significantly reduced extubation time (SMD -3.11; 95% CI -3.77 to -2.45; p<0.001) compared to routine nursing in cardiac surgery patients.
Why the study?
To systematically evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on perioperative nursing of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Does enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) nursing improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Meta-Analysis
Yes
Does enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) nursing improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
ERAS nursing accelerates perioperative rehabilitation and improves patient satisfaction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Supports incorporating ERAS nursing into cardiac surgical pathways; strengthens meta-analytic evidence for accelerated recovery protocols.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on perioperative nursing of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP using predefined search strings from inception of database to May 2021. Randomized control trials (RCTs) with sample size >40 on cardiac surgery with either ERAS nursing or routine nursing reporting extubation (trachea) time, length of stay, out of bed activity time, and nursing satisfaction were included in the analysis. Stata SE 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 27 RCTs were included. All the included studies were Chinese due to lack of studies in English. The results of meta-analysis showed that the extubation time standardized mean difference ([SMD] = -3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.77, -2.45; p < .001), out of bed activity time (SMD = -2.89; 95% CI: -3.34, -2.44; p < .001), and hospitalization time (SMD = -2.08; 95% CI: -2.37, -1.79; p < .001) of cardiac surgery patients with ERAS nursing was significantly shorter than those with routine nursing. The patient's satisfaction after surgery with ERAS was higher than that of routine nursing relative risk ([RR] = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.30; p < .001). CONCLUSION: ERAS nursing can accelerate perioperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing cardiac surgery and highly accepted by patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiac surgery. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) nursing vs. Routine nursing was evaluated on Extubation time (SMD -3.11, 95% CI -3.77, -2.45, p=< .001). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) nursing significantly reduced extubation time (SMD -3.11; 95% CI -3.77 to -2.45; p<0.001) compared to routine nursing in cardiac surgery patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: