Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To describe the outcomes of tuck-in tenon patch graft (TPG) in the management of corneal perforation up to 5-mm size. METHODS: Thirty-one cases of sterile corneal perforation (3-5 mm) underwent autologous TPG. The technique included, freshening of the edges, measuring the size of defect, creating a 360-degree stromal pocket around the perforation margin, harvesting the tenon graft followed by tucking into the stromal pocket, and application of cyanoacrylate glue or suturing the graft using 10-0 monofilament nylon suture. The main outcome measure was rate of healing (percentage of cases healed). RESULTS: The mean age was 52.3 ± 8.9 years with 22 male and 9 female patients. The various etiologies of corneal perforation included trauma (n = 10), neurotrophic keratitis (n = 11), and peripheral ulcerative keratitis (n = 10). The mean size of corneal perforation was 4.2 ± 0.6 mm (range 3-5 mm). The mean duration of epithelial healing was 25.7 ± 6.7 days. Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 1.8 ± 0.4 to 1.2 ± 0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units at 4 weeks after surgery (P ≤ 0.01). Twenty-seven (87.1%) cases healed with formation of a leucomatous scar at 16.9 ± 2.7 weeks, whereas 4 cases had a flat anterior chamber. In three-fourths of the cases, a corneal graft was performed. In one case, graft resuturing was performed for post-op aqueous leak, which healed with the formation of a corneo-iridic scar. CONCLUSIONS: TPG is a safe, simple, inexpensive, and an effective technique for the management of corneal perforations. The advantages include the autologous nature of the graft, cost effectiveness, and easy availability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: