Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ann Intern Med 2000;132:810–9 Commissioned by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, this meta-analysis reviewed articles comparing Pap testing with a reference standards, such as histology, colposcopy, repeat cytology, or combinations these techniques. These data were used to complete 2 × 2 tables to calculate indices of accuracy. Many studies were derived from colposcopy clinics; patients without prior abnormal smears have a lower prevalence of abnormality. In the 12 studies with least biased estimates, Pap test sensitivity ranged from 30–87% and specificity from 86–100%. Results varied depending on the threshold designation of abnormality for cytology (ASCUS vs. LGSIL vs. HGSIL) and for comparison test (CIN1 vs. CIN2–3). Comment: As the authors point out, the utility of cytologic screening in cervical cancer prevention lies not in the accuracy of a single smear, since sensitivity is less than ideal, but in the accuracy of lifetime screening. A single smear should not be relied on to determine the presence or absence of disease. (LSM)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nanda et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: