In a previous paper, Schoner and Wedley [9] presented a way to automatically compute the importance of criteria from the values of alternatives. The following discussion illustrates that the approach of [9] can only be applied if the alternatives under the criteria are measured with a single absolute scale. However, when this does occur, in part or in all of a decision problem, the approach is extraneous. The measurements can (and should) first be combined with the appropriate arithmetic of that scale which reduces that part of the problem to a single dimension and the result can be taken up with the remaining dimensions for consideration with AHP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ernest H. Forman (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: