Key result
The female athlete triad, comprising disordered eating, amenorrhea, and osteoporosis, is a potentially lethal condition in young female athletes that requires early recognition and prevention.
Early recognition and a collaborative approach are essential for preventing and managing the female athlete triad.
May warrant screening in young female athletes; leaves open optimal prevention strategies pending prospective trials.
Purpose of review: The purpose of this article is to provide some background and describe the three components of the female athlete triad. Recent findings: The three medical conditions within the female athlete triad are interrelated in terms of origins and associated results. Individually, these ailments can affect an athlete’s ability to perform and ultimately increase the risk of injury and possibly even death. Early recognition of the ‘triad’ can be accomplished by thorough risk-factor assessment and screening questions. A collaborative effort among coaches, athletic trainers, parents, athletes, and physicians is optimal for the recognition and prevention of the triad. Summary: In a time of expanding opportunities for young women, increasing participation in sports has been observed. Participation in sports has led to significant health benefits for women. Several medical disorders, however, have become more prevalent as the number of female athletes has increased. The female athlete triad, defined as the combination of disordered eating, amenorrhea and osteoporosis, was first defined in 1993. The young female athlete, driven to excel in her chosen sport, may be at risk of developing this potentially lethal triad of medical disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rooks et al. (2006) conducted a review in Female athlete triad. The female athlete triad, comprising disordered eating, amenorrhea, and osteoporosis, is a potentially lethal condition in young female athletes that requires early recognition and prevention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: