Key result
A bibliometric analysis of 5,335 publications from 2002 to 2021 identified the USA and the CDC as the most productive country and institution in poliomyelitis research.
Why the study?
Poliomyelitis is an acute infectious disease caused by poliovirus, and this study aimed to examine the status of poliomyelitis research in the past 20 years.
This bibliometric analysis identifies research hotspots and trends in poliomyelitis research from 2002 to 2021, highlighting the USA and CDC as major contributors.
US/CDC dominance maps poliomyelitis research trends; leaves open equitable global collaboration and translation to eradication.
Poliomyelitis is an acute infectious disease caused by poliovirus. This bibliometric analysis aims to examine the status of poliomyelitis research in the past 20 years. Information regarding polio research was obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Excel were used to perform visual and bibliometric analysis with respect to countries/regions, institutions, authors, journals and keywords. A total of 5,335 publications on poliomyelitis were published from 2002 to 2021. The USA was the county with the majority of publications. Additionally, the most productive institution was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sutter, RW produced the most papers and had the most co-citations. Vaccine was the journal with the most polio-related publications and citations. The most common keywords were mainly about polio immunology research (“polio,” “immunization,” “children,” “eradication” and “vaccine”). Our study is helpful for identifying research hotspots and providing direction for future research on poliomyelitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) studied Poliomyelitis (n=5,335). A bibliometric analysis of 5,335 publications from 2002 to 2021 identified the USA and the CDC as the most productive country and institution in poliomyelitis research.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: