This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Risk assessments relying on the U.S. EPA reference dose (RfD) for methylmercury exposure have led to restrictive fish consumption advisories in many states. These advisories fail to account for the benefits associated with fish consumption. Although the use of an RfD is valuable in efforts to regulate industrial emissions, food consumption advice should occur within a broader context that includes consideration of both risks and benefits.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egeland et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: