Key result
Multicomponent quality improvement tools designed to standardise or improve ICU care will be evaluated in a scoping review to determine their characteristics, format, and content.
Why the study?
Quality improvement tools like checklists aim to improve quality and safety, but have not been designed for the specific needs of patients experiencing prolonged intensive care unit stays.
Systematic Review
This protocol outlines a scoping review to identify and characterize multicomponent quality improvement tools used in the ICU, aiming to inform the development of tools for patients with prolonged ICU stays.
Scoping review protocol maps ICU QI tools; leaves open optimal formats to standardize care for prolonged stays.
Background: Increasing numbers of critically ill patients experience a prolonged intensive care unit stay contributing to greater physical and psychological morbidity, strain on families, and cost to health systems. Quality improvement tools such as checklists concisely articulate best practices with the aim of improving quality and safety, however these tools have not been designed for the specific needs of patients with prolonged ICU stay. The primary objective of this review will be to determine the characteristics including format and content of multicomponent tools designed to standardise or improve ICU care. Secondary objectives are to describe the outcomes reported in these tools, the type of patients and settings studied, and to understand how these tools were developed and implemented in clinical practice. Methods: We will search the Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, OpenGrey, NHS evidence and Trial Registries from January 2000 onwards. We will include primary research studies (e.g. experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, and qualitative studies) recruiting more than 10 adult participants admitted to ICUs, high dependency units and weaning centres regardless of length of stay, describing quality improvement tools such as structured care plans or checklists designed to standardize more than one aspect of care delivery. We will extract data on study and patient characteristics, tool design and implementation strategies and measured outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen citations for eligible studies and perform data extraction. Data will be synthesised with descriptive statistics; we will use a narrative synthesis to describe review findings. Discussion: The findings will be used to guide development of tools for use with prolonged ICU stay patients. Our group will use experience-based co-design methods to identify the most important actionable processes of care to include in quality improvement tools these patients. Such tools are needed to standardise practice and thereby improve quality of care. Illustrating the development and implementation methods used for such tools will help to guide translation of similar tools into ICU clinical practice and future research.Systematic Review Registration: This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/Z8MRE
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allum et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Prolonged intensive care unit stay / Critical illness. Multicomponent quality improvement tools vs. Usual care, other tools, or no comparator was evaluated on Characteristics (format and content) of multicomponent tools designed to standardise or improve ICU care. Multicomponent quality improvement tools designed to standardise or improve ICU care will be evaluated in a scoping review to determine their characteristics, format, and content.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: