Key result
Fimasartan demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing sitting office systolic blood pressure compared to valsartan (-16.26 vs -12.81; p=0.0298) after 6 weeks of treatment.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to perform a head-to-head comparison of the blood pressure lowering effect of fimasartan versus valsartan, with olmesartan as a reference, on office and ambulatory blood pressure.
Does fimasartan reduce blood pressure more than valsartan in Korean patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension?
RCT (n=365)
Double-blind
3:3:1 ratio
Yes
Does fimasartan reduce blood pressure more than valsartan in Korean patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension?
Fimasartan 120 mg demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing office and ambulatory blood pressure compared to valsartan 160 mg in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports fimasartan preference over valsartan for Korean patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension; extends direct ARB comparative RCT evidence.
PURPOSE: Head-to-head comparison of the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of fimasartan versus valsartan, with olmesartan as a reference, on office blood pressure and ambulatory BP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 369 randomly assigned patients in this study, 365 hypertensive patients were referred as the full analysis set and divided into 3 groups with a 3:3:1 ratio (fimasartan group: 155, valsartan group: 157, olmesartan group: 53). After the 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, initial standard doses of 60-mg fimasartan, 80-mg valsartan, and 10-mg olmesartan were administered for 2 weeks, then forcibly up-titrated higher doses (fimasartan 120 mg, valsartan 160 mg, olmesartan 20 mg) were given for 4 weeks. ABP was measured before and after the 6-week treatment. Primary endpoint was reduction of sitting office systolic BP (SiSBP) of fimasartan compared to valsartan after 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints were reduction of sitting office diastolic BP (SiDBP) and 24 hrs, day-time, and night-time mean systolic and diastolic ABP (ASBP, ADBP) after 6 weeks. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 58.34±7.68 years, and 289 patients were male (79.18%). After the 6-week treatment, SiSBP reduction of fimasartan and valsartan were -16.26±15.07 and -12.81±13.87 (p=0.0298) and SiDBP were -7.63±9.67 and -5.14±8.52 (p=0.0211). Reductions in 24 hrs mean ASBP were -15.22±13.33 and -9.45±12.37 (p=0.0009), and ADBPs were -8.74±7.55 and -5.98±7.85 (p=0.0140). Reductions of night-time ASBPs were -16.80±15.81 and -10.32±14.88 (p=0.0012), and those of night-time ADBPs were -8.89±9.93 and -5.55±9.70 (p=0.0152). Reduction of BP in olmesartan group did not demonstrate significant difference with fimasartan group in all end-points. CONCLUSION: Fimasartan 120-mg treatment demonstrated superior efficacy in reduction of SiSBP, SiDBP, and 24 hrs ASBP and ADBP compared to valsartan 160 mg. Reduction of night-time ASBP from baseline was largest in fimasartan group, suggesting that fimasartan may be effective for recovering dipping pattern. NCT NUMBER: NCT02495324 (Fimasartan Achieving SBP Target (FAST) study).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension (n=365). Fimasartan vs. Valsartan (80 mg up-titrated to 160 mg) and Olmesartan (10 mg up-titrated to 20 mg) was evaluated on reduction of sitting office systolic BP (SiSBP) after 6 weeks (p=0.0298). Fimasartan demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing sitting office systolic blood pressure compared to valsartan (-16.26 vs -12.81; p=0.0298) after 6 weeks of treatment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: