Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report the surface, structural, and optical properties of typical Ga- and N-polar GaN films grown on sapphire substrates by molecular beam epitaxy. The Ga-polar films were grown on AlN buffer while the N-polar films were grown on GaN buffer layers. Atomic force microscopy imaging shows that the as-grown and chemically etched Ga-polar films have a flat and pitted surface while the N-polar surface is rougher with isolated columns or islands. Transmission electron microscopy demonstrates a low density of inversion domains in the Ga-polar films, while a much higher density of inversion domains was observed in the N-polar films. X-ray diffraction curves show a narrower (002) peak for Ga-polar films than that for N-polar films. On the other hand, both Ga- and N-polar films show a similar width of (104) peak. Despite their rough surfaces, high density of inversion domains, and broader (002) x-ray diffraction peaks, N-polar films with low dislocation density were demonstrated. In addition, higher PL efficiency for the N-polar films than that for the Ga-polar films was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: