Key result
Heart-ROCQ trial evaluates combined pre- and postoperative cardiac rehab against standard care in cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
The rising prevalence of modifiable risk factors is increasing potentially avoidable complications in cardiac surgery patients, prompting evaluation of whether combined preoperative and postoperative multidisciplinary rehabilitation improves outcomes.
Does a combined preoperative and postoperative multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation programme improve functional status and reduce surgical complications, readmissions, and MACE in patients awaiting open heart surgery compared to standard postoperative care?
RCT (n=350)
open, blinded endpoint
randomised
Does a combined preoperative and postoperative multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation programme improve functional status and reduce surgical complications, readmissions, and MACE in patients awaiting open heart surgery compared to standard postoperative care?
This study protocol outlines a trial to determine if a comprehensive pre- and postoperative cardiac rehabilitation program improves clinical and functional outcomes compared to standard postoperative care in patients undergoing open heart surgery.
Heart-ROCQ protocol launches evaluation in 350 open-heart surgery patients; leaves open whether combined pre- and postoperative rehabilitation improves outcomes versus standard care.
INTRODUCTION: The rising prevalence of modifiable risk factors (eg, obesity, hypertension and physical inactivity) is causing an increase in possible avoidable complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This study aims to assess whether a combined preoperative and postoperative multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme (Heart-ROCQ programme) can improve functional status and reduce surgical complications, readmissions and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients (n=350) are randomised to the Heart-ROCQ programme or standard care. The Heart-ROCQ programme consists of a preoperative optimisation phase while waiting for surgery (three times per week, minimum of 3 weeks), a postoperative inpatient phase (3 weeks) and an outpatient CR phase (two times per week, 4 weeks). Patients receive multidisciplinary treatment (eg, physical therapy, dietary advice, psychological sessions and smoking cessation). Standard care consists of 6 weeks of postsurgery outpatient CR with education and physical therapy (two times per week). The primary outcome is a composite weighted score of functional status, surgical complications, readmissions and MACE, and is evaluated by a blinded endpoint committee. The secondary outcomes are length of stay, physical and psychological functioning, lifestyle risk factors, and work participation. Finally, an economic evaluation is performed. Data are collected at six time points: at baseline (start of the waiting period), the day before surgery, at discharge from the hospital, and at 3, 7 and 12 months postsurgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (V.8, October 2013). The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethical Review Board of the UMCG (no 2016/464). Results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed scientific journal and can be presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02984449.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartog et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in awaiting open heart surgery (n=350). Heart-ROCQ programme (combined preoperative and postoperative multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation) vs. standard care (6 weeks postsurgery outpatient CR) was evaluated on composite weighted score of functional status, surgical complications, readmissions and MACE. A combined preoperative and postoperative multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation program (Heart-ROCQ) will be evaluated against standard care in 350 patients awaiting open heart surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: