This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Short stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have the potential to improve periprosthetic bone preservation compared to conventional stems due to a more anatomical distribution of biomechanical force. This study is a follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial using ultra-short and conventional stems in THA with the aim to investigate the long-term changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) at 6 and 10 years post-THA. Methods: A cohort of 51 patients with hip osteoarthritis were randomized to either an ultra-short stem ( n = 26) or a conventional stem ( n = 25) group. Periprosthetic BMD was measured at 6- and 10-years post-surgery. Primary endpoint was BMD changes in Gruen zones 1 and 7. Lumbar spine, L1-4, BMD was used as an indicator of overall bone loss. Clinical outcome scores and BMD changes in Gruen zone 1-7 were used as secondary endpoints. Results: 37 hips, 17 ultra-short stems and 20 conventional stems, were followed up until 10 years. At 6- and 10-years post-THA, the ultra-short stem group had less periprosthetic BMD reduction compared to the conventional stem group in Gruen zone 1; mean differences (%) were -17.6 (CI, -23.4–-10.6) and -18.3 (CI, -28.0–-9.0), respectively ( p < 0.001). There was similar BMD loss in Gruen zone 7 and zones 1–7 between groups. Compared to overall bone loss, the ultra-short stem group lost less BMD than the conventional group. Adverse events and clinical outcomes did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Over a 10-year follow-up, THA using an ultra-short stem exhibited significantly reduced periprosthetic BMD loss in Gruen zone 1 compared to the conventional stem but this did not result in better clinical results. The observed preservation of bone density suggests potential long-term advantages of the ultra-short stem in minimising stress shielding and maintaining periprosthetic bone quality. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration (number NCT01319227)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Axenhus et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: