Key result
A history of pre-eclampsia was associated with significantly lower flow-mediated dilation (5.1% vs 9.4%; P<0.01) and carotid distensibility, and higher carotid intima-media thickness than controls.
Why the study?
Obesity and pre-eclampsia (PE) both associate with vascular dysfunction and late cardiovascular risk, but whether an interaction exists between body mass index (BMI) and history of PE on vascular health was unknown.
Does a history of pre-eclampsia and body mass index affect markers of vascular health in normotensive women postpartum?
Case-Control (n=61)
Does a history of pre-eclampsia and body mass index affect markers of vascular health in normotensive women postpartum?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.1% vs 9.4%
p-value: p=< 0.01
A history of pre-eclampsia is associated with impaired endothelial function and increased carotid intima-media thickness independently of BMI, while BMI and pre-eclampsia synergistically worsen insulin resistance.
May warrant vascular risk awareness after pre-eclampsia; leaves open whether markers predict events or guide intervention.
OBJECTIVE: Obesity and pre-eclampsia (PE) are both associated with vascular dysfunction, which translates into an increased risk for cardiovascular disease in later life. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an interaction between body mass index (BMI) and a history of PE in their effects on vascular health. METHODS: This was an observational case-control study of 30 women with a history of PE who were compared with 31 age- and BMI-matched controls who had an uncomplicated pregnancy. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid distensibility (CD) were measured 6-12 months postpartum. To evaluate the impact of physical fitness, maximum oxygen uptake capacity was assessed using a standardized maximum exhaustion cycling test using breath-by-breath analysis. To specify further BMI subgroups, metabolic syndrome constituents were assessed in all individuals. RESULTS: Formerly pre-eclamptic women had significantly lower FMD (5.1 ± 2.1% vs 9.4 ± 3.4%; P < 0.01), higher cIMT (0.59 ± 0.09 vs 0.49 ± 0.07 µm; P < 0.01) and lower CD (1.54 ± 0.37%/10 mmHg vs 1.80 ± 0.39%/10 mmHg; P < 0.01) compared with controls. In our study, population BMI correlated negatively with FMD (P = 0.04) but not with cIMT or CD. BMI and PE did not exhibit an interaction effect on these vascular parameters. Physical fitness was lower in women with a history of PE and in women with higher BMI. Constituents of the metabolic syndrome, including insulin, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-ir), triglyceride, microalbuminuria and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, were significantly higher in formerly pre-eclamptic women. BMI affected glucose metabolism but not lipids or blood pressure. BMI and PE positively interacted in their effect on insulin (P = 0.04) and HOMA-ir (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Both BMI and a history of PE have negative effects on endothelial function, insulin resistance and physical fitness. In formerly pre-eclamptic women, the effect of BMI on insulin resistance was particularly high, suggesting a synergistic effect. Additionally, independently of BMI, a history of PE was associated with reduced FMD and CD and increased cIMT and blood pressure. Recognizing the cardiovascular risk profile is important for informing patients and encouraging targeted lifestyle modifications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heidema et al. (2023) conducted a case-control in History of pre-eclampsia (n=61). History of pre-eclampsia vs. Uncomplicated pregnancy was evaluated on Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (p=< 0.01). A history of pre-eclampsia was associated with significantly lower flow-mediated dilation (5.1% vs 9.4%; P<0.01) and carotid distensibility, and higher carotid intima-media thickness than controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: