Key result
Ticagrelor was approved by the FDA for acute coronary syndromes despite objections from clinical and statistical reviewers regarding its efficacy and safety in the 18,624-patient PLATO trial.
Why the study?
Does ticagrelor improve efficacy and safety compared to clopidogrel in patients with moderate- to high-risk acute coronary syndromes?
Does ticagrelor improve efficacy and safety compared to clopidogrel in patients with moderate- to high-risk acute coronary syndromes?
This review highlights that the FDA approval of ticagrelor for acute coronary syndromes occurred despite significant objections from multiple primary and statistical reviewers regarding its efficacy and safety.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution advised with ticagrelor in ACS due to unresolved reviewer concerns; leaves open the validity of PLATO trial conclusions.
CONTEXT: On July 20, 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ticagrelor (Brilinta™) for use during acute coronary syndromes. The drug labeling includes a 'black box' warning for bleeding risks, conventional for antithrombotics, and a unique warning that higher than 100 mg/daily maintenance treatment with aspirin may reduce ticagrelor effectiveness. The approval was granted following ticagrelor secondary reviews, and review of complete response by FDA officials. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the recommendations of different FDA reviewers, and their impact on drug approval. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Review of the Platelet Inhibition and Clinical Outcomes (PLATO) trial comparing the efficacy of ticagrelor versus standard care treatment with clopidogrel. Patients (n = 18,624) with moderate- to high-risk acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary intervention or being medically managed were randomized to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300-600-mg loading dose followed by 75 mg once daily) for 6-12 months. RESULTS: The facts outlined in official reviews suggest that ticagrelor has been approved despite objections from both clinical primary reviewers assessing drug efficacy and safety. In addition, the statistical reviewer and cross-discipline team leader also recommended against approval. The putative grounds for their concerns were retrieved from the public FDA records and are briefly outlined here.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victor L. Serebruany (2012) conducted a review in acute coronary syndromes (n=18,624). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated. Ticagrelor was approved by the FDA for acute coronary syndromes despite objections from clinical and statistical reviewers regarding its efficacy and safety in the 18,624-patient PLATO trial.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: