Key result
44-hour interdialytic ABPM detected hypertension in 59% of pediatric hemodialysis patients vs 24% by casual measurement, and nighttime diastolic BP correlated with increased LVMI (r=0.53, P=0.03).
Why the study?
Does 44-hour interdialytic ABPM better predict increased LVMI and LVH compared to casual BP measurement in pediatric hemodialysis patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=17)
Does 44-hour interdialytic ABPM better predict increased LVMI and LVH compared to casual BP measurement in pediatric hemodialysis patients?
In pediatric hemodialysis patients, 44-hour interdialytic ABPM is superior to casual BP measurement for identifying hypertension and correlates better with left ventricular hypertrophy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ABPM may better detect hypertension tied to LVMI in pediatric HD; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Children undergoing chronic hemodialysis are at risk of cardiovascular disease and often develop left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is known to better predict cardiovascular morbidity than casual blood pressure (BP) measurement. Given the BP variability attributed to interdialytic fluid overload, 44-h ABPM should better delineate cardiovascular morbidity in pediatric hemodialysis patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 17 children (16.7 ± 2.9 years) on chronic hemodialysis underwent 44-h interdialytic ABPM and routine echocardiogram. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was calculated by height-based equation; LVH was defined as an LVMI in the ≥95th percentile for height-age and gender. Hypertension was defined by the recommendations of the Fourth Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program for casual measurements, and by those of the American Heart Association for ABPM. RESULTS: Twenty-four percentage of patients were hypertensive by casual post-dialytic systolic BP, whereas 59% were hypertensive by ABPM. Eighty-eight percentage of patients had abnormal cardiac geometry: 53% had LVH. Thirty-five percentage (6 of 17) had masked hypertension, including four with abnormal cardiac geometry, of which, three had LVH. LVMI correlated with ABPM, but not with casual measurements. Strongest correlations with an increased LVMI were with 44-h diastolic BP: at night (r = 0.53, P = 0.03) and total load (r = 0.57, P = 0.02). LVH was similarly associated with 44-h nighttime BP: systolic (P = 0.02), diastolic (P = 0.01) and mean arterial (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Casual BP measurement underestimates hypertension in pediatric hemodialysis patients and does not correlate well with indicators of cardiovascular morbidity. In contrast, 44-h interdialytic ABPM better characterizes hypertension, with nighttime parameters most strongly predicting increased LVMI and LVH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsoufis et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in chronic hemodialysis (n=17). 44-h interdialytic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) vs. casual blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Hypertension detection. 44-hour interdialytic ABPM detected hypertension in 59% of pediatric hemodialysis patients vs 24% by casual measurement, and nighttime diastolic BP correlated with increased LVMI (r=0.53, P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: