Key result
Open-heart surgery for mitral regurgitation and stenosis compares favorably with closed procedures in morbidity and mortality rates, offering greater technical accuracy and promising long-term results.
Why the study?
Does open-heart surgery improve morbidity and mortality compared to closed manipulations in patients with mitral stenosis and insufficiency?
Does open-heart surgery improve morbidity and mortality compared to closed manipulations in patients with mitral stenosis and insufficiency?
Open-heart surgery under direct vision is replacing closed procedures for mitral valve disease due to favorable morbidity and mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May favor open-heart over closed mitral procedures; leaves open need for randomized confirmation in current practice.
The surgical techniques used in the correction of mitral valvular stenosis and insufficiency have shared in the rapid evolution introduced by the open methods of intracardiac surgery. The past 3 years have witnessed a rapidly growing adoption of procedures on the mitral valve performed under direct vision. At present, many workers have already reported their initial experiences with these new techniques.1-8Their results would suggest that closed manipulations are gradually being discarded in the surgical treatment of mitral stenosis and have become altogether obsolete in the attempted correction of mitral incompetence. Not only do the open methods already compare favorably with the closed procedures in morbidity and mortality rates, but the greater technical accuracy possible with them promises much more in the way of long-term results in the rehabilitation of these patients. Our experiences at the Cardiology Department and the Thoracic Surgery Service at Hahnemann Hospital have paralleled these
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry T. Nichols (1961) conducted a review in Mitral Regurgitation and Stenosis. Open-heart surgery (open methods of intracardiac surgery) vs. Closed manipulations (closed procedures) was evaluated. Open-heart surgery for mitral regurgitation and stenosis compares favorably with closed procedures in morbidity and mortality rates, offering greater technical accuracy and promising long-term results.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: