Key result
Community-based outreach provision of the NHS Health Check reached a significantly more deprived population, with attendees having a mean Index of Multiple Deprivation score 6.01 higher than the general population (p < 0.05).
Why the study?
Does community-based outreach provision of the NHS Health Check programme effectively reach under-served groups (deprived, ethnic minorities, younger eligible adults) compared to the general population?
Cross-Sectional (n=43,177)
Yes
Does community-based outreach provision of the NHS Health Check programme effectively reach under-served groups (deprived, ethnic minorities, younger eligible adults) compared to the general population?
Mean Difference: 6.01
Absolute Event Rate: 30.15% vs 24.14%
p-value: p=<0.05
Community-based outreach for cardiovascular disease prevention effectively reaches younger and more deprived populations compared to the general population, highlighting a viable strategy to reduce health inequalities.
Outreach may better engage deprived groups in NHS Health Checks; hypothesis-generating for reducing inequalities, needs prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of premature mortality and a major contributor of health inequalities in England. Compared to more affluent and white counterparts, deprived people and ethnic minorities tend to die younger due to preventable CVD associated with lifestyle. In addition, deprived, ethnic minorities and younger people are less likely to be served by CVD prevention services. This study assessed the effectiveness of community-based outreach providers in delivering England's National Health Services (NHS) Health Check programme, a CVD preventive programme to under-served groups. METHODS: Between January 2008 and October 2013, community outreach providers delivered a preventive CVD programme to 50,573 individuals, in their local communities, in a single consultation without prescheduled appointments. Community outreach providers operated on evenings and weekends as well as during regular business hours in venues accessible to the general public. After exclusion criteria, we analysed and compared socio-demographic data of 43,177 Health Check attendees with the general population across 38 local authorities (LAs). We assessed variation between local authorities in terms of age, sex, deprivation and ethnicity structures using two sample t-tests and within local authority variation in terms of ethnicity and deprivation using Chi squared tests and two sample t-tests respectively. RESULTS: Using Index of Multiple Deprivation, the mean deprivation score of the population reached by community outreach providers was 6.01 higher (p < 0.05) than the general population. Screened populations in 29 of 38 LAs were significantly more deprived (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference among ethnic minority groups was observed between LAs. Nonetheless some LAs - namely Leicester, Thurrock, Sutton, South Tyneside, Portsmouth and Gateshead were very successful in recruiting ethnic minority groups. The mean proportion of men screened was 11.39% lower (p < 0.001) and mean proportion of 40-49 and 50-59 year olds was 9.98% and 3.58% higher (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01 respectively) than the general population across 38 LAs. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based outreach providers effectively reach under-served groups by delivering preventive CVD services to younger, more deprived populations, and a representative proportion of ethnic minority groups. If the programme is successful in motivating the under-served groups to improve lifestyle, it may reduce health inequalities therein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woringer et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease prevention (n=43,177). Community-based outreach provision of NHS Health Check vs. General population was evaluated on Mean Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score (MD 6.01, p=<0.05). Community-based outreach provision of the NHS Health Check reached a significantly more deprived population, with attendees having a mean Index of Multiple Deprivation score 6.01 higher than the general population (p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: