The purpose of this study was to assess the bacteriologic status of the root canal after sonic, ultrasonic and hand instrumentation. Root canal infection was induced in 50 single‐rooted teeth in young dogs by removing the pulp and filling the canals with dental plaque. After 7 clays the root canals were instrumented under aseptic conditions with conventional hand instruments, a sonic vibratory device or an ultrasonic device. Sterile saline or 2.5% sodium hypochlorite was used as irrigating solution. Following instrumentation a sterile paper point was sealed into the root canals. After 7 d the root canals were reopened under aseptic conditions and the paper points were incubated for the demonstration of bacteria, using pre‐reduced thioglycolate culture medium and anaerobic chambers. The results obtained with the different instrumentation techniques and irrigating solutions were compared by means of the Chi‐square test. The results indicated that the sonic and ultrasonic devices were not more effective in the elimination of bacteria from the root canal than conventional hand instrumentation. Irrigation with sodium hypochlorite appeared to be more effective than saline in producing bacteria‐free root canals; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Thus, it appeared that more than one appointment and the supporting action of an antibacterial medicament between appointments would be necessary to achieve bacteria‐free root canals in infected teeth in a predictable manner.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barnett et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: