Key result
Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with nilotinib had a significantly higher prevalence of established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (31.8%) compared to those treated with imatinib or dasatinib (2.9%).
Why the study?
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors improve life expectancy in chronic myeloid leukemia but are linked to increased cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors.
Does nilotinib increase the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease compared to imatinib and dasatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia?
Cross-Sectional (n=73)
No
Does nilotinib increase the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease compared to imatinib and dasatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia?
Absolute Event Rate: 31.8% vs 2.9%
p-value: p=0.004
In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, treatment with nilotinib is associated with a significantly higher prevalence of dyslipidemia, peripheral arterial disease, and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease compared to imatinib and dasatinib.
Introduction: Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved the life expectancy of these patients.However, TKIs have been related to an increase in cardiovascular events.These occur especially in patients who already had cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF).Material and methods: An observational cross-sectional study of patients with CML under treatment with TKI was conduced.The prevalence of CVRF, target organ damage and subclinical and symptomatic atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) was studied.Results: 73 patients were included.63.01% were male.The median age was 56 years (IQR 45 -67,50).47.95% had high blood pressure, 17.33% diabetes mellitus, 40.79% dyslipidemia, 50.68% overweight, 26.03 obesity and 21.92% were smokers.19.20% presented microalbuminuria, 8.20% left ventricular hypertrophy and 19.18% chronic kidney disease.32.90% had high values of hsCRP and 26% high values of pulse wave velocity.11.07% had ASCVD.Patients treated with nilotinib had a higher prevalence of dyslipidemia, smoking, peripheral arterial disease, and ASCVD.Conclusions: The prevalence of CVRF was higher than that described in the general Spanish population.Patients treated with nilotinib had a higher prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, peripheral arterial disease, and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease than patients treated with imatinib and dasatinib.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roa-Chamorro et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic myeloid leukemia (n=73). Nilotinib vs. Imatinib and dasatinib was evaluated on Established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (p=0.004). Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with nilotinib had a significantly higher prevalence of established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (31.8%) compared to those treated with imatinib or dasatinib (2.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: