Key result
Valvular HF linked to ~23% greater risk of waitlist death or deterioration vs other etiologies.
Why the study?
Valvular heart failure accounts for 1-5% of heart transplant listings, but comparative outcomes relative to other heart failure etiologies remain poorly characterized.
Do adult heart transplant candidates with valvular heart failure have different waitlist events and post-transplant survival compared to those with other heart failure etiologies?
Cohort
Yes
Do adult heart transplant candidates with valvular heart failure have different waitlist events and post-transplant survival compared to those with other heart failure etiologies?
Valvular heart failure patients face a higher waitlist mortality risk than non-VHF patients, but have comparable post-transplant survival, supporting early referral and optimization for this distinct phenotype.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
VHF diagnosis does not affect transplantation rates; leaves open its influence on waitlist progression and post-transplant survival.
PURPOSE: Valvular heart failure (VHF) accounts for 1-5% of heart transplant listings. Comparative outcomes relative to other heart failure etiologies remain poorly characterized. This study defines the VHF phenotype and compares waitlist and transplant outcomes to other heart failure recipients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study uses the UNOS thoracic transplant database to analyze adult, first-time, heart-only listings with a diagnosis of heart disease. Patients were grouped by diagnosis as VHF or non-VHF. The primary outcome was waitlist events; post-transplant survival and outcomes were secondary analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed in the post-2018 allocation era. RESULTS: VHF recipients were older (55.3 vs 54.0 years, P = 0.004), more frequently female (36.1% vs 25.0%, P < 0.001), and had higher rates of prior cardiac surgery (P < 0.001) with greater pulmonary vascular burden. At time of listing, VHF recipients had higher ECMO rates (4.9% vs 2.5%, P < 0.001) and lower VAD use (17.3% vs 31.7%, P < 0.001). VHF diagnosis was not independently associated with transplantation rates (SHR 0.979, P = 0.749) but was associated with a 23% higher rate of waitlist death/too sick to transplant (SHR 1.233, P = 0.005). Post-transplant survival was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.812). Post guideline changes, the waitlist mortality difference was attenuated. CONCLUSION: VHF represents a distinct but transplantable phenotype of heart failure. Although VHF patients faced higher waitlist mortality risk, allocation framework revisions attenuated this difference, and post-transplant survival is comparable to non-VHF recipients. Independent predictors of mortality are patient-level risk factors, supporting early referral and optimization as the primary strategy for outcome improvement in this phenotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelley et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Valvular heart failure. Valvular heart failure vs. Non-valvular heart failure was evaluated on Waitlist events (waitlist death or too sick to transplant) (SHR 1.233, p=0.005). Valvular heart failure was associated with a 23% higher rate of waitlist death or becoming too sick to transplant compared to other heart failure etiologies (SHR 1.233, P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: