Two sets of soluble high performance polyimides synthesized from 2,2′‐bis(3,4‐dicarboxyphenyl)hexafluoropropane dianhydride (6FDA) and 2,2′‐(trifluoromethyl)‐4,4′‐diaminobiphenyl diamine (PFMB), and from 2,2′‐bis(trifluoromethyl)‐4,4′,5,5′‐biphenyl‐tetracarboxylic dianhydride (HFBPDA) and 2,2′‐(trifluoromethyl)‐4,4′‐diaminobiphenyl diamine (PFMB) have been investigated by static and dynamic laser light scattering (LLS) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at 30°C. The calibrations, for 6FDA‐PFMB: <Rg> (nm) = 3.87 × 10−2 <Mw> 0.568, <Rh> (nm) = 2.38 × 10−2 <Mw>0.560 and <D> (cm2/s) = 2.13 × 10−4 <Mw>−0.560; for HFBPDA‐PFMB: <Rg> (nm) = 2.24 × 10−2 <Mw>0.626, <Rh> (nm) = 1.27 × 10−2 <Mw>0.621 and <D> (cm2/s) = 3.99 × 10−4 <Mw>−0.621, have been established, where <M2>, <Rg>, <Rh> and <D> are the weight‐average molar mass, the root mean square z‐average radius of gyration, the z‐average hydrodynamic radius and the z‐average translational diffusion coefficient, respectively. A combination of <Mw> and the translational diffusion coefficient distribution G(D) leads to the calibrations of D (cm2/s) = 2.41 × 10−4M−0.564 and D (cm2/s) = 6.16 × 10−4M−0.656 for 6FDA‐PFMB and HFBPDA‐PFMB, respectively, where D and M correspond to monodisperse species. With these calibrations, we can convert a translational diffusion coefficient distribution G(D) into a corresponding molar mass distribution fw(M). On the basis of the Kratky‐Porod wormlike chain model, the persistence lengths (q) were found to be ˜ 3.3 nm and ˜ 4.5 nm, respectively, for 6FDA‐PFMB and HFBPDA‐PFMB, which indicates that both polyimide chains have an extended conformation. In addition, <Rg> / <Rh> ˜ (1.7‐1.9) shows that they are in coil conformation. Therefore, we conclude that both polyimides have an extended coil conformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwan et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: