Key result
Prophylactic catheter ablation before ICD implantation significantly prolonged the time to electrical storm occurrence compared to no ablation in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (p=0.04).
Why the study?
Does single endocardial prophylactic catheter ablation delay appropriate ICD therapy and electrical storm in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and sustained ventricular tachycardia?
Cohort (n=101)
Does single endocardial prophylactic catheter ablation delay appropriate ICD therapy and electrical storm in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and sustained ventricular tachycardia?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single endocardial prophylactic catheter ablation before ICD implantation in NICM patients can delay electrical storm, but its overall efficacy is limited by low success rates and high VT recurrence.
BACKGROUND: Outcomes related to prophylactic catheter ablation (PCA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are not well characterized. We assessed the efficacy of single endocardial PCA in NICM patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 101 consecutive NICM patients with sustained VT. We compared clinical outcomes of patients who underwent PCA (ABL group) with those who did not (No ABL group). Successful PCA was defined as no inducible clinical VT. We also compared the clinical outcomes of patients with successful PCA (PCA success group) with those of the No ABL group. Endpoints were appropriate ICD therapy (shock and anti-tachycardia pacing) and the occurrence of electrical storm (ES). RESULTS: PCA was performed in 42 patients, and it succeeded in 20. The time to ES occurrence was significantly longer in the ABL group than in the No ABL group (p=0.04). The time to first appropriate ICD therapy and ES occurrence were significantly longer in the PCA success group than in the No ABL group (p=0.02 and p<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Single endocardial PCA can decrease ES occurrence in NICM patients. However, high rates of VT recurrence and low success rates are issues to be resolved; therefore, the efficacy of single endocardial PCA is currently limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with sustained ventricular tachycardia (n=101). Prophylactic catheter ablation (PCA) vs. No prophylactic catheter ablation was evaluated on Appropriate ICD therapy and occurrence of electrical storm (p=0.04). Prophylactic catheter ablation before ICD implantation significantly prolonged the time to electrical storm occurrence compared to no ablation in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: