Key result
Prophylactic catheter ablation significantly reduced appropriate ICD therapies (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55-0.89; p=0.004) compared to no ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation is effective for drug-refractory VT in ischemic cardiomyopathy, prompting a systematic evaluation of prophylactic catheter ablation outcomes in this population.
Does prophylactic catheter ablation reduce appropriate ICD therapies and mortality in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Meta-Analysis (n=505)
Does prophylactic catheter ablation reduce appropriate ICD therapies and mortality in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Prophylactic catheter ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy significantly reduces the risk of appropriate ICD therapies and shocks, though it does not significantly impact cardiac or all-cause mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reduces ICD therapies and shocks in ischemic cardiomyopathy; confirms intervention benefit without mortality impact.
AIMS: Catheter ablation is an effective strategy for drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) in ischemic cardiomyopathy. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of prophylactic catheter ablation (PCA) of Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search through February 10, 2020, for all eligible randomized controlled trials that compared "PCA" versus "No PCA" for VT. Primary efficacy outcomes included - appropriate ICD therapy (composite of anti-tachycardia pacing and ICD shock), appropriate ICD shocks, electrical storm, cardiac mortality, and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcome was any adverse events. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials (N = 505) met inclusion criteria. Prophylactic catheter ablation was associated significant reduction in appropriate ICD therapies (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55 - 0.89, p = 0.004), appropriate ICD shocks (RR 0.57 95% CI 0.40 - 0.80, p = 0.001) with a trend towards reduced risk of electrical storm (RR 0.64; CI 0.39 - 1.05; p = 0.075) compared to "No PCA". There was no significant difference in cardiac mortality (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.31 - 1.43, p = 0.29) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.52 - 1.82, p = 0.94) with similar adverse events (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.73 - 2.95, p = 0.29) between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic catheter ablation in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients was associated with a lower risk of ICD therapies, including ICD shocks and VT storm with no difference in cardiac and all-cause mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2020 study conducted a meta-analysis in Ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=505). Prophylactic catheter ablation vs. No prophylactic catheter ablation was evaluated on Appropriate ICD therapy (composite of anti-tachycardia pacing and ICD shock) (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 - 0.89, p=0.004). Prophylactic catheter ablation significantly reduced appropriate ICD therapies (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55-0.89; p=0.004) compared to no ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: