Key result
Routine screening with high-sensitivity troponin T and ECGs showed that over 40% of ICU patients admitted for non-cardiac reasons had myocardial infarctions, of which >80% were misdiagnosed.
Why the study?
Does routine screening with high-sensitivity troponin and ECG improve the diagnosis and outcomes of myocardial infarction in critically ill patients?
Does routine screening with high-sensitivity troponin and ECG improve the diagnosis and outcomes of myocardial infarction in critically ill patients?
While routine high-sensitivity troponin screening in the ICU reveals a high incidence of unrecognized myocardial infarction, its clinical utility remains uncertain given the lack of difference in mortality and the high rate of non-ischemic troponin elevation.
In ICU settings, the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are challenging, partly because cardiac troponin increase occurs frequently. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Ostermann and colleagues reported that myocardial infarction (MI), screened by plasma troponin and electrocardiography changes, is common and often clinically unrecognized in the ICU. Although the clinical significance of underdiagnosed MIs remains unclear, this approach may help to target and further investigate the at-risk population for appropriate therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klouche et al. (2014) conducted an editorial in Critically ill patients admitted for non-cardiac reasons (n=144). Routine screening with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and ECG vs. Clinical recognition was evaluated on Incidence of study-identified myocardial infarction. Routine screening with high-sensitivity troponin T and ECGs showed that over 40% of ICU patients admitted for non-cardiac reasons had myocardial infarctions, of which >80% were misdiagnosed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: