Launching a new academic publication is something that always requires some justification, especially when the output in question has a somewhat unconventional format. The question that is likely to be asked is whether there is genuinely a niche that is not already being filled. African studies may sometimes seem like a crowded field, but the thinking that lies behind the launch of Critical African Studies is that the manner in which academic research and publishing on Africa have evolved has yielded a landscape which, while very interesting in parts, is also somewhat predictable. Since the demise of the Southern African Review of Books (1987-1996),1 which always had a more limited regional remit, there has been a need for outlets in which Africanists can dwell on the importance of particular contributions as well as the state of the field in general. While a forum such as Critical African Studies cannot hope to reinvigorate African studies single-handedly, it can widen the space available for critical reflection on what we all do.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Nugent (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: