Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A 38-year-old woman had posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation as a secondary refractive procedure to correct residual refraction (20/50 with -16.50 -1.50 x 80) in May 1998, 3 years after intrastromal corneal ring segment surgery for high myopia (-30.00 diopters). Ultrasound biomicroscopy revealed an oversized lens, leading to malpositioning. Moreover, the patient remained undercorrected (20/40 with -5.25 -0.75 x 120). Ten months later, the phakic IOL was uneventfully exchanged for a shorter one with the correct dioptric power. It was well placed in the posterior chamber. The patient's visual acuity was 20/30 with -2.25 -0.75 x 145, very close to the refraction in the fellow aphakic eye (20/30 with -2.50 -0.75 x 75). Patient satisfaction with the final visual outcome was high. Accurate ciliary sulcus measurement is critical for proper phakic IOL sizing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trindade et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: