Key result
Pre-oxygenation with THRIVE significantly increased arterial partial pressure of oxygen at 5 minutes compared to facemask pre-oxygenation (446.1 vs 261.5 mmHg, P<0.001) in elderly patients undergoing rapid sequence induction.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) versus facemask pre-oxygenation during general anesthesia induction in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for intestinal obstruction.
Does transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) improve arterial partial pressure of oxygen and extend safe apnea time compared to facemask pre-oxygenation in patients ≥65 years of age undergoing general anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery?
RCT (n=40)
Single-blind
Computer randomization software in a 1:1 ratio
No
Does transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) improve arterial partial pressure of oxygen and extend safe apnea time compared to facemask pre-oxygenation in patients ≥65 years of age undergoing general anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 446.1% vs 261.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
In elderly patients undergoing rapid sequence induction for gastrointestinal surgery, pre-oxygenation with THRIVE significantly improves oxygenation and extends safe apnea time compared to facemask pre-oxygenation.
May support THRIVE for pre-oxygenation in elderly GI surgery patients; extends high-flow nasal oxygen evidence to rapid-sequence induction.
BACKGROUND In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) with facemask pre-oxygenation in 40 patients ≥65 years of age undergoing general anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery for intestinal obstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with gastrointestinal obstruction were randomized to either a facemask group (group M, n=20) or THRIVE group (group T, n=20). During pre-oxygenation, the 2 groups used a facemask (100% oxygen, 6 L/min) and THRIVE (100% oxygen, 40 L/min) to supply oxygen, respectively. Induction of anesthesia was performed in both groups using facemasks and without mechanical or assisted ventilation. The intubation occurred after myorelaxant action began. When the peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) dropped below 95%, or 480 s after administration of muscle relaxants, mechanical ventilation was initiated immediately. The primary outcome was arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂) at 5 min after pre-oxygenation. A secondary outcome was time to SpO₂ of 95% during apnea, with a cut-off time of 480 s. RESULTS PaO₂ at 5 min after pre-oxygenation was (261.5±30.9) mmHg for group M and (446.1±84.4) mmHg for group T (P<0.001). Based on survival analysis, the median time-to-event in group T was 480 s (95% CI 415.7 s - upper limit unknown) and 240 s (95% CI 225.9-254.1 s) in group M (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In elderly patients undergoing rapid sequence induction, pre-oxygenation with THRIVE could improve oxygenation and extend safe apnea time, compared with facemask pre-oxygenation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Gastrointestinal obstruction requiring rapid sequence induction of anesthesia (n=40). Transnasal Humidified Rapid Insufflation Ventilator Exchange (THRIVE) vs. Facemask pre-oxygenation (100% oxygen at 6 L/min) was evaluated on Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) at 5 min after pre-oxygenation (p=<0.001). Pre-oxygenation with THRIVE significantly increased arterial partial pressure of oxygen at 5 minutes compared to facemask pre-oxygenation (446.1 vs 261.5 mmHg, P<0.001) in elderly patients undergoing rapid sequence induction.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: