Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Coal is of heterogeneous nature with a complex chemical structure, which is closely associated with its reactivity. In this research, from the perspective of the chemical structure of coal, reaction characteristics of the as-synthesized CuFe 2 O 4 oxygen carrier (OC) with a typical Chinese bituminous coal (designated as LZ) were deeply investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Also, the effect of CuFe 2 O 4 oxygen excess number Φ on the reaction behavior of LZ coal with CuFe 2 O 4 was highlighted. TGA investigation of LZ coal reaction with CuFe 2 O 4 at Φ = 1.0 displayed the enhanced reactivity of CuFe 2 O 4, which was useful to conversion of the aromatic matrix in LZ coal. Furthermore, during LZ coal reaction with CuFe 2 O 4 in the TGA, the gaseous products evolved from the condensed flue gas were in situ analyzed using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), which indicated that most of the CO 2 resulted from oxidation of CO by CuFe 2 O 4 OC. Meanwhile, the solid product left after LZ coal reaction with CuFe 2 O 4 was analyzed with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), which revealed that oxidation and conversion of the C–C/C–H groups was the limited step at the molecular scale for full conversion of coal. Finally, the effect of CuFe 2 O 4 excess number Φ for LZ coal reaction with CuFe 2 O 4 was investigated by TGA, and the solid product left was analyzed by XPS, which indicated that C–C/C–H was more effectively converted at CuFe 2 O 4 Φ = 1.0 than Φ = 0.5 and 1.5 at the final reaction temperature of 900 °C. In addition, the mechanism of coal oxidation by CuFe 2 O 4 was also explored, and the C–C/C–H involved in LZ coal was preferentially oxidized to form C–O groups and then further converted to O═C–O groups through the formed intermediate C═O groups. Overall, this research was much beneficial for a mechanistic understanding of the conversion of coal in a CLC system and promotion of the efficient utilization of coal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: