Randomized trial reveals pulse methylprednisolone does not improve remission in active ulcerative colitis, indicating standard oral prednisone remains sufficient.
BACKGROUND: Oral corticosteroids remain the treatment of choice for moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC), achieving clinical remission in 30%-60% of patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of steroid-free clinical-endoscopic remission at weeks 8 and 54 in patients treated with 3 methyl-prednisolone pulses before oral corticosteroids in moderately active UC versus those only receiving oral corticosteroids. DESIGN: Prospective, open, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with left/extensive, moderately active UC, naive to immunosuppressants and biological agents, were randomized to receive conventional treatment (CT) with oral prednisone 60 mg/day or the same regimen preceded by an additional daily pulse (AP) of 500 mg of methyl-prednisolone for 3 days. All patients who responded started oral mesalazine and were followed up until month 12 or clinical relapse. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were randomized: 39 were allocated to the CT arm and 36 to the AP arm. Overall, 21 patients achieved clinical-endoscopic remission (28%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23%-33%) at both weeks 8 and 54 without needing rescue treatments, being not significantly different between both study groups (23% [95%CI: 14%-32%] CT vs. 33% [95%CI: 21%-45%] AP; P = 0.323). Patients in the AP group had higher rates of clinical response at day 3 and remission at day 7. No significant differences in adverse events were observed. Due to early termination, the study was underpowered, and findings should be interpreted as exploratory. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 3 pulses of high-dose corticosteroids to a conventional regimen of oral prednisone does not improve medium and long-term clinical outcomes in moderately active UC. TRIAL REGISTRATION CODES: EudraCT number 2016-001170-15; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02921555.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Llaó et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: