Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Because compensation and dispute resolution lie at the core of most resettlement proposals, this panel had two main objectives: to get an accurate grasp of the current Israeli approach to these challenges and to glean insights from relevant experiences in other settings. Before reading our panelists’ presentations, one might be forgiven for reasonably thinking that “compensation equals cash” and “dispute resolution equals court.” As our panelists discussed, however, such a straightforward view is simply inadequate to the needs of the resettlement problem — a much richer view of compensation and dispute resolution is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebenius et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: