Key result
Adverse cardiovascular events at one year were significantly more frequent in men (43%) than in women (19%) following dobutamine stress echocardiography for suspected coronary disease (p < 0.01).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the influence of gender on the diagnostic accuracy of DSE and on the prognostic significance of WMSI for adverse cardiovascular events.
Does gender influence the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography and the prognostic significance of WMSI for adverse cardiovascular events in patients with suspected coronary disease?
Observational (n=143)
No
Does gender influence the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography and the prognostic significance of WMSI for adverse cardiovascular events in patients with suspected coronary disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 43% vs 19%
p-value: p=< 0.01
Gender influences the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography, with higher sensitivity in men, while WMSI remains a significant prognostic factor for adverse cardiovascular events in both sexes.
Background/Aim. Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, with the highest incidence in low-middle-income countries. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) plays a significant role in diagnosing coronary artery disease. The aim of the study was to examine the influence of gender on the accuracy of DSE and on the prognostic significance of the left ventricular wall motion score index (WMSI) as a parameter of DSE for adverse cardiovascular events (ACEs). Methods. The prospective, observational study conducted at the Clinic for Cardiovascular Diseases of the University Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, included 143 patients who, due to suspicion of coronary disease, under-went a DSE from January 1, 2021, until February 1, 2022. ACEs that we observed one year after DSE were: unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, in-stent restenosis, aortocoronary bypass, heart failure, and death. Results. A positive DSE was more common in men (45%) compared to women (25%), which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The sensitivity of the test in men was 96.0%, and the specificity was 93.9%. In women, the sensitivity was 86.7%, and specificity was also 86.7%. ACEs were more frequent in men (43%) than in women (19%), which was statistically significant (p < 0.01). In men, WMSI had a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 82.4%. In women, WMSI had a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 90.6% in predicting ACEs. Conclusion. Our results confirmed the influence of gender on the accuracy o f D SE i n diagnosing coronary artery disease. WMSI as a parameter of DSE was identified as a significant prognostic factor for ACEs in both sexes, with the sensitivity being higher in men and specificity in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trninić et al. (2024) conducted an observational in suspicion of coronary disease (n=143). Male gender vs. Female gender was evaluated on Adverse cardiovascular events (ACEs) (p=< 0.01). Adverse cardiovascular events at one year were significantly more frequent in men (43%) than in women (19%) following dobutamine stress echocardiography for suspected coronary disease (p < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: