Key result
Cardiac MRI provides a powerful noninvasive tool for functional cardiovascular analysis and tissue characterization to diagnose and manage cardiovascular complications related to cancer.
Why the study?
Cardiac MRI is playing a growing role in evaluating cardiac pathology and cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction, with current guidelines incorporating it into multidisciplinary cancer care.
Cardiac MRI is an increasingly important noninvasive tool for diagnosing and managing cardiovascular complications related to cancer and its treatment, and is being incorporated into current guidelines.
May support CMR integration in cardio-oncology; leaves open prospective outcome trials.
From detailed characterization of cardiac abnormalities to the assessment of cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction, cardiac MRI is playing a growing role in the evaluation of cardiac pathology in oncology patients. Current guidelines are now incorporating the use of MRI for the comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to cancer management, and innovative applications of MRI in research are expanding its potential to provide a powerful noninvasive tool in the arsenal against cancer. This review focuses on the application of cardiac MRI to diagnose and manage cardiovascular complications related to cancer and its treatment. Following an introduction to current cardiac MRI methods and principles, this review is divided into two sections: functional cardiovascular analysis and anatomical or tissue characterization related to cancer and cancer therapeutics. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1349-1366.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2019) conducted a review in Cardiac complications in oncology patients. Cardiac MRI was evaluated. Cardiac MRI provides a powerful noninvasive tool for functional cardiovascular analysis and tissue characterization to diagnose and manage cardiovascular complications related to cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: