Key result
Intravascular Doppler sonography using a microprobe was successfully performed in 95.6% of patients with healthy vessels and correlated well with angiography in patients with arterial stenoses.
Why the study?
Is intravascular Doppler sonography with a 0.3 mm microprobe feasible and accurate for measuring blood flow velocity in patients undergoing angiography?
Observational (n=54)
Is intravascular Doppler sonography with a 0.3 mm microprobe feasible and accurate for measuring blood flow velocity in patients undergoing angiography?
Intravascular Doppler sonography using a microprobe is a feasible and valid method for measuring blood flow velocity in vessels that are difficult to assess percutaneously.
Should not yet change angiographic practice; leaves open prospective validation of microprobe Doppler utility.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The authors investigated the feasibility and accuracy of intravascular Doppler sonography (IVDS) with a newly developed microprobe. METHODS: The known method to determine blood flow velocity by transcutaneous Doppler sonography was transferred to an intravascular usable Doppler probe. With the improved technique, a microprobe measuring 0.3 mm in diameter can be advanced through a 5F catheter used in routine diagnostic angiography to perform intravascular Doppler sonography. In a first step, the conditions for application and measurement were studied in a flow tube model and were transferred in a second step to patients undergoing routine angiography and patients with arterial stenoses. RESULTS: Measurements with nondegassed liquids showed a high intensive acoustic signal, but no echo effect could be recorded in degassed liquids. IVDS of healthy vessels in 40 patients showed the same typical flow pulse curve as seen in transcutaneous measurements. The optimal position of the microprobe with respect to the contact of the vessel wall, the diastolic and systolic phase, and the distance to the tip of the catheter could be evaluated. In 95.6% of the 40 patients with healthy vessels, IVDS was successful. Fourteen patients with arterial stenotic diseases were investigated before and after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and the results of these investigations correlated well with the angiographical results. CONCLUSIONS: For percutaneously directly reachable vessels, the transcutaneous Doppler sonography is the choice for easy noninvasive and inexpensive measurement of blood flow velocity. However, for vessels that are difficult or impossible to reach percutaneously, intravascular measurement is a valid procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schumacher et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Arterial stenoses (n=54). Intravascular Doppler sonography (IVDS) was evaluated on Feasibility (successful measurement). Intravascular Doppler sonography using a microprobe was successfully performed in 95.6% of patients with healthy vessels and correlated well with angiography in patients with arterial stenoses.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: