This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
There is an impressive number of data and code reproducibility initiatives, both within Europe and across the world. To motivate researchers to use this amazing infrastructure, we must show the translational research community that the aforementioned initiatives are able to drive change in translational science. Here we demonstrate that using public datasets, it is reasonable to build a pipeline for proposal and validation of driver mutation and subtype-specific colorectal cancer medications. While all three molecular, clinical and chemical name harmonization were necessary, open data and code initiatives, while varied in their approaches, made this project possible.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kubica et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: