Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Legitimacy is a key concern when introducing data about work in healthcare, especially as data-driven systems move closer to real-world application and begin shaping how care work is represented, interpreted, and shared across stakeholders. This paper reports healthcare workers’ (HCWs’) perspectives on data sharing in a design project that uses workflow data to support care, including accounting for the needs of patients and caregivers. Guided by the principle of “minimum viable datafication” [62]- limiting data production and sharing to what is meaningful and contextually appropriate - we engage Dourish’s [26] notion of the “legitimacy trap,” in which participatory processes appear consultative, but ultimately reinforce designer or managerial assumptions. Aiming to pro-actively achieve legitimacy, rather than falsely assume it, we contribute three lessons for the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Health community: 1) data representations should attune to workers’ lived experiences; 2) HCWs should be enabled to care both for their own data-related needs and the impact of data sharing on patients and caregivers; and 3) space should be created for contestation and negotiation, recognizing that data sharing must remain responsive to how stakeholders experience the representation of work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: