Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ruthenium-catalyzed hydrogenation of CO 2 into formic acid was theoretically investigated with the DFT(B3LYP) method, where cis -RuH 2 (PH 3 ) 4 was adopted as a catalyst model. Theoretical calculations show that (1) CO 2 insertion into the Ru−H bond occurs with an activation energy ( E a ) of 29.3 kcal/mol in cis -RuH 2 (PH 3 ) 4 and with an E a value of 10.3 kcal/mol in cis -RuH 2 (PH 3 ) 3; (2) six-membered σ-bond metathesis of RuH(η 1 -OCOH)(PH 3 ) 3 (H 2 ) occurs with a much smaller E a value (8.2 kcal/mol) than four-membered σ-bond metathesis ( E a = 24.8 kcal/mol) and five-membered H−OCOH reductive elimination ( E a = 25.5 kcal/mol); (3) three-membered H−OCOH reductive elimination requires a very much larger E a value of 43.2 kcal/mol; (4) if PH 3 dissociates from cis -RuH 2 (PH 3 ) 4, the CO 2 hydrogenation takes place through the CO 2 insertion into the Ru−H bond of RuH 2 (PH 3 ) 3 followed by the six-membered σ-bond metathesis, where the rate-determining step is the CO 2 insertion; and (5) if PH 3 does not dissociate from cis -RuH 2 (PH 3 ) 4 and cis -RuH(η 1 -OCOH)(PH 3 ) 4, the CO 2 hydrogenation proceeds through the CO 2 insertion into the Ru−H bond of cis -RuH 2 (PH 3 ) 4 followed by the H−OCOH reductive elimination, where the rate-determining step is the CO 2 insertion. From the above conclusions, one might predict that (1) excess phosphine suppresses the reaction, (2) the use of solvent that facilitates phosphine dissociation is recommended, and (3) the ruthenium(II) complex with three phosphine ligands is expected to be a good catalyst. The electronic processes and characteristic features of the CO 2 insertion reaction and the σ-bond metathesis are discussed in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Musashi et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: