Key result
Each 1 m/s increase in estimated pulse-wave velocity was associated with a 53% increased adjusted risk of all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
In people with type 2 diabetes, it was unknown whether estimated pulse-wave velocity adds prognostic information beyond the parameters used for calculating it.
Does estimated pulse-wave velocity (ePWV) independently predict all-cause mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=15,773)
Yes
Does estimated pulse-wave velocity (ePWV) independently predict all-cause mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes?
Effect estimate: +53% risk per 1 m/s increase
Estimated pulse-wave velocity (ePWV) provides independent prognostic information for all-cause mortality beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes.
ePWV was independently associated with mortality in type 2 diabetes; extends prior prognostic data but leaves open added value for routine risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Estimated pulse-wave velocity (ePWV), a surrogate measure of arterial stiffness, was shown to independently predict morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease and other causes in both the general population and high-risk individuals. However, in people with type 2 diabetes, it is unknown whether ePWV adds prognostic information beyond the parameters used for calculating it. AIMS: To assess the independent association of ePWV with all-cause mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study that enrolled 15 773 patients in 19 Italian centres in 2006-08. METHODS: ePWV was calculated from a regression equation using age and mean blood pressure (BP). All-cause mortality was retrieved for 15 656 patients in 2015. RESULTS: Percentage and rate of deaths, Kaplan-Meier estimates and unadjusted hazard ratios increased from Quartile I to Quartile IV of ePWV. After adjustment for age, sex, BP levels and anti-hypertensive treatment, the strength of association decreased but mortality risk remained significantly higher for Quartiles II (+34%), III (+82%) and IV (+181%) vs. Quartile I and was virtually unchanged when further adjusting for other cardiovascular risk factors and complications/comorbidities. Each m·s- 1 increase in ePWV was associated with an increased adjusted risk of death in the whole cohort (+53%) and in participants with (+52%) and without (+65%) cardiorenal complications. Moreover, ePWV significantly improved prediction of mortality risk over cardiovascular risk factors and complications/comorbidities, though the net increase was modest. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ePWV may represent a simple and inexpensive tool for providing prognostic information beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00715481, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00715481.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solini et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=15,773). Estimated pulse-wave velocity (ePWV) vs. Lower ePWV (Quartile I) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (+53% risk per 1 m/s increase). Each 1 m/s increase in estimated pulse-wave velocity was associated with a 53% increased adjusted risk of all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: